Comments on: WOW IE9, you’ve come a long way… http://chriskoenig.net/2010/09/16/wow-ie9-youve-come-a-long-way/ Microsoft Technical Evangelist Thu, 16 May 2013 19:12:08 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1 By: Vet69 http://chriskoenig.net/2010/09/16/wow-ie9-youve-come-a-long-way/comment-page-1/#comment-434 Vet69 Sat, 25 Jun 2011 18:07:00 +0000 http://chriskoenig.net/2010/09/16/wow-ie9-youve-come-a-long-way/#comment-434 I got this piece of shit IE-9 through windows update.  Why would they send out something you can not usse with everyday use.  My bank tells me they can not fix the problem as it is not certified.  So is short, I can not use my on-line banking.  This is a shit until it gets certified.  Way to Go Microsoft!

]]> By: Chris Benard http://chriskoenig.net/2010/09/16/wow-ie9-youve-come-a-long-way/comment-page-1/#comment-292 Chris Benard Fri, 17 Sep 2010 18:04:00 +0000 http://chriskoenig.net/2010/09/16/wow-ie9-youve-come-a-long-way/#comment-292 You are overstating the numbers in the javascript benchmark, as are they.

934.4/815.4 = 1.15. That doesn’t mean it’s 1.15x faster. It means IE9 spent 1.15x the time Chrome spent. It’s only 0.15x slower, not 1.15x slower.

In the math section, Chrome loses to IE due to the one sub-component: cordic. I’d like to know more information about that. Chrome soundly trounces it in the other 2 sub-components. 12.7x is quite a difference.

]]>